A strategic alliance is not a press release with two logos side by side. It's an agreement that must generate measurable pipeline within a defined time, or it should be closed.
“A strategic alliance without a dedicated owner and a quarterly goal doesn't die from a specific event. It dies slowly, from mutual neglect.”
Otto GTM ObservatoryStrategic alliances that generate real value have a named owner on both sides, explicit quarterly goals (pipeline generated, co-sold deals), and a regular review cadence, not annual.
Without these three elements, the alliance survives only in the form of the signed agreement: nobody invests active time to make it work, and the value expected at the start never materializes, without this ever becoming an explicit problem to discuss.
Common mistake: signing the alliance at the leadership level without naming an operational owner on both sides responsible for quarterly results, letting the initiative stall at the implementation stage.
Second mistake: evaluating alliance success only on visibility metrics (press mentions, joint events) instead of pipeline or revenue actually generated, masking an initiative that produces no real commercial value.
A strategic alliance between two software companies generates a joint press release and three webinars in the first year, but zero tracked co-sold deals. After naming a dedicated alliance manager on both sides with an explicit goal of €500,000 in co-generated pipeline per quarter, the alliance produces €340,000 of pipeline in the first quarter of active management.